It would seem that the Senate has moved on to other issues that do not include unemployment legislation and the expiring benefits for jobless Americans. Nor has a realistic means of support been suggested for the projected 1.6 million people who will suddenly be without the means to purchase essentials. What issue could be of such importance to senators that the very survival of large numbers of the people that they represent is not their top priority? Apparently, politics.
I had not intended to target Congress yet again in this blog about leadership but this is too easy…and too necessary. Who should the Senate be representing if not the most needy residents of their states? In my home state of California unemployment hovers near 12.2%, which out of a population of about 43,310,433 people means well over five million of them are jobless and dependent upon unemployment benefits. Five million people! What could be the economics of ignoring their plight? Will it hasten recovery? It seems doubtful to me.
We all belong to gradually increasing and overlapping concentric circles of community: family, neighborhood, town, friends, colleagues, state, country, business and so on. Often these communities come into conflict and we find it necessary to prioritize one over another. Often such conflicts give rise to an ethical dilemma. In the case of Congress, the conflicting communities appear on the surface to be political party vs. constituents in need. It can be rationalized (and I'm sure it is!) that the greater good can be achieved by success at the polls leading to the institution of newer, better policies. But in so doing, by thwarting legislation of the current administration, these Congressmen are ignoring a greater need and responsibility as leaders, that of the huge numbers of unemployed. Fix the hole in the dam and then talk about whether it is in the right place on the river!
While the need for effective leadership in our country and the world grows, a void in leadership skills and tools is becoming increasingly apparent. As a leader, how do you make the right decisions for yourself? for the world? When looking at the ethical question, should it be about the greatest good, or about the greatest need? The Jones/Covrig decision making model suggests six questions when facing such dilemmas, including: "How important is the immediacy of this decision to other stakeholders?" and "How concentrated will the effects of this decision be on any one stakeholder?". While bias must necessarily effect the leader's consideration, particularly with so many powerful stakeholders involved, the totality of the responses to the six questions must identify the areas of greatest ethical intensity. Once established, it is time for the leader to look internally for personal honor and courage, and act.
Addressing an ethical dilemma can be difficult. But not recognizing that you face one is a travesty.
from Rich Gamble Associates and Leadership Education Resources in Los Alamos. LER makes available custom leadership curriculum building resources. We recognize the growing need to bring leadership and character skills to the forefront in education throughout America - and to bring education front and center in our national consciousness as our best resource in the face of rapid global change. We will print our thoughts and ideas here and we welcome your thoughts and ideas in exchange.
The posts below are the original work and property of Rich Gamble Associates. Use of this content, in whole or in part, is permitted provided the borrower attribute accurately and provide a link. "Thoughts from under the Palm" are the educational, social, and political commentary by the author intended to provoke thought and discusion around character and leadership .
No comments:
Post a Comment