The posts below are the original work and property of Rich Gamble Associates. Use of this content, in whole or in part, is permitted provided the borrower attribute accurately and provide a link. "Thoughts from under the Palm" are the educational, social, and political commentary by the author intended to provoke thought and discusion around character and leadership .

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Fracking Follow-up


Two nights ago I was turned away from a meeting in Los Alamos led by a representative of Venoco Inc. who explained to me that the meeting was for Venoco lease contractees, mostly land owners and supervisors, only. Was anything to be disclosed that the public shouldn't know? It seems not. The meeting was later described as an attempt by Venoco representatives to make the case to their lessees that their lands and the ground water beneath them are not endangered by the company's oil and gas extracting methods.
Fracking in the Los Alamos Valley has finally become an open topic of discussion. That's good, because the future of the land and all that resides below it and above it is the business of all of us - and it is everybody's responsibility. As our natural resources dwindle in the face of a burgeoning population of consumers and a changing climate the dispersement and the safeguarding of these resources is important to every single one of us. All residents need to arm ourselves with an understanding of the choices that must be made, the choices will be necessary ultimately to conserve the quality of life and perhaps even life itself.
There will be fewer and fewer easy answers.
For Los Alamos and this valley the resources in question are oil and water. We cannot understand fully the impact of one on the other and the questions surrounding both until we get answers. What is the future plan for each? Will these plans impact one another? What choices will have to be made? What priorities must be set?
It is troubling that the oil companies, in this case Venoco, choose to keep their activities a secret. Until persistent questions were directed to county administrators by our local citizenry resulting in inquiries being made it seemed no one was even aware that hydraulic fracturing was taking place here, this despite a national - nay, international hue and cry on the subject. Nor will oil companies disclose the precise formula they inject deep into the earth. Congress has sat on a bill for several years now that would have forced this disclosure, at the least to local supervisors, thus allowing emergency precautions to be put in place.
The recent meeting held by Venoco to share information with at least part of the public was a positive step, whether or not one agrees with their conclusions. The representative promised a second meeting this month, this time for the general public. Meanwhile the district supervisors have made their presence known and the topic of fracking is to be taken up in the June 7 Board of Supervisors meeting, which is open to the public. Another meeting will be attended by DOGGR, the state body tasked with regulating and supervising oil extracting processes, and is to be held August 4. Both meetings are held in Santa Barbara.
There are several issues to consider: contamination of the water supply from both injected toxics and surface spills, seismic disturbances from concussion and weakening underlying ledge, disposal of recovered toxics, and the huge amounts of water required for fracking and water injection, taken from the aquifer (3% of the amount of water consumed by the town of Los Alamos in a year, per well).
It is disturbing that there is no legislation in Santa Barbara county that requires the oil companies to disclose the methods they will use in their wells. It is distressing that formulas with toxins may be injected deep into the earth. Venoco has assured land owners that the depth of the wells, claimed to be between 8000 and 10000 feet, protect the aquifer and that a casing sheath seals the well from the aquifer where it passes down through it. They may be right but if they are not it will be too late.
To my mind, the philosophy that supports injecting toxic fracking fluids into the earth at great depth is similar to the philosophy supporting dumping unwanted waste into our oceans where we can no longer see it. We are now discovering how that worked out.
Yes, we are a petroleum culture through and through but that shouldn't mean that we can't continue to try to make changes. At what cost freedom from foreign oil? We need oil for our lifestyle. We need water for life.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Fracking Around Los Alamos


It would seem that fracking is indeed occurring in the Los Alamos valley.
In my February 2011 post I raised the specter of adding pollutants from invasive oil and gas drilling to an already diminished aquifer in the Los Alamos valley. At the time, there was no direct evidence that hydraulic fracturing techniques were being used. I had learned, however, that there was rejuvenated interest on the part of Venoco Inc. in utilizing new fracking and horizontal drilling techniques to extract oil from the Miocene Monterey formation, a rich but not naturally fractured layer underlying much of the transverse California coastal ranges, including the Los Alamos Valley. The appearance of two drilling operations within a few hundred feet of each other within the San Antonio Creek flood basin down the valley suggested to me the possibility of a Monterey Shale hydraulic fracturing oil play. But there was no ready means of identifying the proprietary oil company or of determining their intentions. The leases being worked had been passed hand to hand with minimal disclosure to the uninitiated and although Vencoco reported (in a shareholders' report) the existence of three Monterey Shale fracturing operations in the nearby Santa Maria valley with a fourth in the offing the location of the last exploratory well was not disclosed. 
In my February post I detailed my reasons for believing that the Los Alamos valley operation might be that fourth, and apparently less public, exploration. After publishing the post I discussed this possibility with a friend, a former participant in the Los Alamos planning board, who agreed that this operation likely involved hydraulic fracturing. He called the office of District County Supervisor Doreen Farr for information. They had none, but promised to look into it. The representative of Supervisor Farr was responsive but seemingly ineffective, ultimately sharing an informative film describing the fracturing methodology currently in use which stressed containment and safety. 
But apparently more was going on than was being made public.
On May 5, 2011 The Independent of Santa Barbara published an article stating that "with the recent discovery by county energy's Doug Anthony" our suspicions were confirmed and that Venoco inc. is indeed utilizing fracking to extract oil and gas at that location, described as "two separate leases in the North County" and vaguely "on private land, just off Highway 135 near Vandenberg Air Force Base".  Anthony asserts that Venoco "did it" without permission and that they "have been resisting" providing information but the two sides are "still working through that". (What?
It seems that "the current county onshore drilling application does not have fracking-specific language" (which I can only regard as a serious oversight) and that they are drilling deep, "like 11,000 to 12,000 feet". If true, that is considerably deeper than the conventional Miocene oil plays in the area, including the Chevron Los Flores well drilled nearby to only 5998 feet. In this area, I have read, the Monterey shale ranges from 4800 to 6200 feet in depth and is between 600 to 1100 feet thick. Oil companies have often promoted deep drilling as a safety feature, suggesting that the greater depth provides a safety barrier between toxics and the water supply. But isn't it really just a matter of time? 
The above descriptions are vague. And the general knowledge demonstrated by local public officials and leaders regarding oil extraction methods in the area appears to be scant. We have just emerged from a wet winter. Our water reservoirs are full. For now. Water conservation as a concern may have slipped down the priority list just a bit. But the reality of a warming planet won't change and the value of water as a vital resource can only grow. How will we balance our energy needs against our water supply needs right here in our own backyard? 
Leadership requires the ability to see the big picture and to adjust one's compass  accordingly, both morally and actually. The mariner in a storm battles each wave at a time but the wiser mariner checked the forecast and stayed in port, avoiding the hazard altogether.

Enhanced by Zemanta